1960 BMW 502 vs. 1985 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1985 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 BMW 502 (100 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1985 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1985 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 BMW 502 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1985 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 502 | 1985 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 502 | Polo |
Year Released | 1960 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 39 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |