1960 BMW 502 vs. 1996 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 BMW 502 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1960 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 502 | 1996 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 502 | Sebring |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |