1960 BMW 502 vs. 1999 Alpina B3
To start off, 1999 Alpina B3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alpina B3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alpina B3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1960 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 502 | 1999 Alpina B3 | |
Make | BMW | Alpina |
Model | 502 | B3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |