1960 BMW 502 vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 424 kg more than 1960 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 502 | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 502 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1834 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |