1960 BMW 502 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 502 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 502 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |
