1960 BMW 502 vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1960 BMW 502 has manual transmission. 1960 BMW 502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 502 | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 502 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 401 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 84 L |
