1960 BMW 502 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 502 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | BMW | Citroen |
| Model | 502 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
