1960 BMW 502 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 BMW 502 (100 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1960 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 502 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 502 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 46 L |
