1960 BMW 700 vs. 2003 Suzuki Lapin
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Lapin is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 700 would be higher. At 697 cc (2 cylinders), 1960 BMW 700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Suzuki Lapin (62 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1960 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Lapin should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Suzuki Lapin weights approximately 160 kg more than 1960 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Lapin, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Suzuki Lapin (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Suzuki Lapin will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 700 | 2003 Suzuki Lapin | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | 700 | Lapin |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 697 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 30 L |
