1960 BMW 700 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1960 BMW 700.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 700 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 700 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 3010 mm |