1960 BMW 700 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1960 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 835 kg more than 1960 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (175 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 700 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 700 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |