1960 Bristol 406 vs. 1952 DKW F 89
To start off, 1960 Bristol 406 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,215 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Bristol 406 (91 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Bristol 406 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Bristol 406 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Bristol 406 | 1952 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Bristol | DKW |
| Model | 406 | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2215 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
