1960 Bristol 406 vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 1979 Mazda 626 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,215 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Bristol 406 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Bristol 406 | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 406 | 626 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2215 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2520 mm |