1960 Bristol 406 vs. 1995 Buick Regal
To start off, 1995 Buick Regal is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick Regal weights approximately 80 kg more than 1960 Bristol 406.
Because 1960 Bristol 406 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Bristol 406. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Bristol 406 | 1995 Buick Regal | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | 406 | Regal |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2215 cc | 2842 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2740 mm |