1960 Bristol 406 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 1960 Bristol 406. (91 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Bristol 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1212 kg more than 1960 Bristol 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 517 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Bristol 406. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Bristol 406 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 406 | Ram |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2215 cc | 8276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 691 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68.7 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.6 mm | 101 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 98 L |