1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 1960 Cadillac 62 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1941 Volvo PV | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | PV |
Year Released | 1960 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |