1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1952 Ferrari 225

To start off, 1960 Cadillac 62 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 225. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 225 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 225 (210 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 225 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 225.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Cadillac 62 1952 Ferrari 225
Make Cadillac Ferrari
Model 62 225
Year Released 1960 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2713 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 197 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 7200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 2195 kg 850 kg
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2260 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]