1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1963 Triumph Herald is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | Herald |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 29 L |
