1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Lamborghini 400
To start off, 1966 Lamborghini 400 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lamborghini 400 (317 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lamborghini 400 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Lamborghini 400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lamborghini |
| Model | 62 | 400 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3927 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 86 L |
