1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1504 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | 62 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1557 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
