1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Cadillac | Sunbeam |
Model | 62 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1960 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 27 L |