1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1968 Zastava 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1216 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2430 mm |
