1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1971 McLaren M19
To start off, 1971 McLaren M19 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 McLaren M19 (444 HP @ 10000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 McLaren M19 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1635 kg more than 1971 McLaren M19.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1971 McLaren M19 | |
| Make | Cadillac | McLaren |
| Model | 62 | M19 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 10000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 560 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2550 mm |
