1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 82 kg more than 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 62 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2118 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 107 L |
