1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1370 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
