1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1410 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2350 mm |
