1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1980 Opel Ascona is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | 62 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1960 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2530 mm |