1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1981 Opel Ascona is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1981 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1981 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 62 | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |
