1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1982 Fiat Panda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Panda |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 652 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2170 mm |
