1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 1983 Donkervoort S7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Donkervoort |
| Model | 62 | S7 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1080 mm |
