1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Toyota Blizzard
To start off, 1983 Toyota Blizzard is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Blizzard. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Blizzard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 940 kg more than 1983 Toyota Blizzard. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Toyota Blizzard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Blizzard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Toyota Blizzard | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Blizzard |
Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2188 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2030 mm |