1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
| Model | 62 | M25 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
