1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Morgan 4
To start off, 1990 Morgan 4 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1990 Morgan 4. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1990 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Morgan |
| Model | 62 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
