1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |
