1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Opel Astra
To start off, 1991 Opel Astra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1991 Opel Astra. (115 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Opel Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1991 Opel Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Opel Astra | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | 62 | Astra |
Year Released | 1960 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |