1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 934 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2210 mm |