1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 1995 Dodge Avenger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 826 kg more than 1995 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Avenger |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2640 mm |
