1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 985 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
