1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Saab 900
To start off, 1995 Saab 900 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Saab 900 (224 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Saab 900 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Saab 900, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Saab 900 | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | 62 | 900 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 224 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |