1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Subaru Alfa
To start off, 1995 Subaru Alfa is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Subaru Alfa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Subaru Alfa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Subaru Alfa | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | 62 | Alfa |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |