1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. (98 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Pajero |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2430 mm |