1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | 62 | SS |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |