1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Ford Versailles
To start off, 1998 Ford Versailles is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1998 Ford Versailles. (92 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Versailles.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Versailles, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Ford Versailles | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Versailles |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 92 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2560 mm |