1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Lancia Lybra

To start off, 1999 Lancia Lybra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1999 Lancia Lybra. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Lancia Lybra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1999 Lancia Lybra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lancia Lybra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Cadillac 62 1999 Lancia Lybra
Make Cadillac Lancia
Model 62 Lybra
Year Released 1960 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2451 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2200 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 60 L