1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2550 mm |