1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Caterham 21
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1655 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Caterham 21 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
| Model | 62 | 21 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |
