1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Hummer H2
To start off, 2000 Hummer H2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hummer H2 (316 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Hummer H2 weights approximately 703 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Hummer H2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
Model | 62 | H2 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 316 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2903 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3130 mm |