1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 640 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | 62 | Profile |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 206 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |