1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 902 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford 49 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | 49 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |
