1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Pininfarina Start
To start off, 2001 Pininfarina Start is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pininfarina Start, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Pininfarina Start | |
Make | Cadillac | Pininfarina |
Model | 62 | Start |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |